Chungliang is the founder-president of the Living Tao Foundation. A philosopher, artist-calligrapher, bamboo flute player, and Tai Ji master-mentor, Al combines his multi-cultural dimensions of learning to inspire the TAO of life-long self-cultivation. He is the author of the classics, "Embrace Tiger, Return to Mountain: The Essence of Tai Ji"; "Quantum Soup: Fortune Cookies in Crisis"; "Beginner's Tai Ji Book"; co-author with Alan Watts of "Tao: The Watercourse Way; and with Jerry Lynch of "Thinking Body, Dancing Mind"; "Working Out, Working Within", and most recently, "Ther Chinese Book of Animal Powers."
Bridging's website is: www.HeavenToEarth.com
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu (translation by Derek Lin)
Tao Te Ching
Tao and Virtue Classic
Tao and Virtue Classic
Tao Classic - Chapters 1 to 37
Te Ching Virtue Classic - Chapters 38 to 81
|
Source:
Translation by Derek Lin
Permission is hereby granted to site visitors who wish to quote from this original work. Please credit as your source www.Taoism.net and Tao Te Ching: Annotated & Explained, published by SkyLight Paths in 2006.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
good marketing of an old book
Sonshi.com is the leading and largest website dedicated to The Art of War, and is the only place backed by over 40 major Sun Tzu authors and scholars. It is a community dedicated to honor, discipline, and achievement.
The foundation of our website is a new and original Sun Tzu The Art of War version that is specifically rendered to be more accurate and complete than all previous Sun Tzu translations.
It took us more than a year to complete this project where we meticulously translated each individual character from the original Chinese text, in addition to cross references with more than six major English editions.
Therefore, we will continue to have our Sun Tzu translation and other features, e.g., author and scholar interviews, available for free to the public as long as there is strong demand and people find the site valuable. The many positive responses from users around the world keep us going!
To help support us financially, please consider subscribing to the Sonshi Dailycourse. Tell others about us: Tell a Friend.
Free explanations of any concept you don't understand in Sun Tzu's Art of War.
We provide a Sun Tzu bookstore. Sonshi.com only presents the most relevant and reputable translations on the market, saving you time from searching all over the Web.
The Temple. A continually updated section containing a daily, discussion board, strategy works throughout history, and more. It represents strategy as a way of life.
The best method of study is to read the text once to get the idea of the work, but come back and read it again (and again) except now reflect on the words. Ponder and visualize.
Most of all, be confident our translation and website are results of diligent and meticulous work geared toward people like yourself who are motivated to learn Sun Tzu. Go far. We will be by your side whenever you need us along the way.
When you are ready, sign up for the Sonshi Daily.
Specifically, strategy is the science and art of military command as applied to the overall planning and conduct of large-scale combat operations. However in general, it is the skillful management, optimization, and application of limited resources intended to accomplish a specific goal.
In practice, strategy is in essence thinking hard about where you fit and where you are in relations to your environment. It's a sometimes painful exercise that challenges your preconceived ideas and beliefs. You're trying to get to an unbiased and objective viewpoint of the way things are. Then, you take action accordingly.
Of course what we said above is not easy to implement. But it can be realized. Therefore, why is strategy important in a person's life? Strategy helps you make the best decisions based on where you are to get to where you want to be. Training is good, but training after a thorough reflection on where you should put your energies is so much better.
Of all the Sun Tzu books currently on the market, we would recommend the Denma Translation Group's Sun Tzu The Art of War. The translation is incredibly accurate and analysis thorough. It took the authors ten years to complete. For a well established version, you may consider General Samuel Griffith's Art of War.
We have listed the most reputable Sun Tzu versions on the Purchase page.
If you are looking for Sun Tzu applications to business practice, we highly recommend Gerald Michaelson's books. To learn more, go to the Michaelson interview.
though the website's writers are anonymous because there are numerous contributors, the buck stops at the desk of Sonshi.com's founder Thomas Huynh. Sonshi.com is a result of a collective voice. After all, we believe what is written is more important than who writes it. Whether our work stands the test of time is up to our intelligent readers. As enthusiasts of the Art of War book, we simply want to share information about it with others.
What does Sonshi mean?
Sonshi is the English transliteration of Sun Tzu in Japanese. In feudal
at is it that you do, and what do you sell?
We provide an educational website for those interested in learning more about Sun Tzu's Art of War. Our goal is to help people apply the book's concepts and principles correctly. In essence, Sonshi.com teaches you how to win in life.
If you ever said to yourself "The Art of War is an extraordinary book ... I want to learn everything about it!" or "Can these ideas be applied to my life?" or "I have this Art of War book ... now what?", you have come to the right place. Long ago when we first started reading the book, we said the same things! That is why we created Sonshi.com. Sun Tzu's Art of War is our sole passion and labor of love. So welcome.
Almost all features are accessible and free of charge -- without spam, ad banners, or pop-up ads. We do have a Purchase page where we recommend the best Art of War books on the market. We also offer the indispensable Daily Strategy Course subscription; these revenues offset some of our expenses maintaining Sonshi.com.
Frequently quoted but quite possibly the most misunderstood verse from Sun Tzu. As a result, one opinion we encountered even suggested Sun Tzu wasn't about warfare at all! It is neither an ethical nor a philosophical statement. Sun Tzu said,
"One who is skilled in warfare principles subdues the enemy without doing battle, takes the enemy's walled city without attacking, and overthrows the enemy quickly, without protracted warfare. His aim must be to take All-Under-Heaven intact. Therefore, weapons will not be blunted, and gains will be intact. These are the principles of planning attacks."
Therefore, it is mostly a practical, economic decision. Doing battle depletes an enormous amount of capital and supplies, leaving one to be vulnerable to attacks by other parties in the future. It also depletes ones spoils. Victory without doing battle means resources are preserved -- including the lives of men.
A leader should always strive for this objective, but depending on various factors (e.g., his skill in strategy, the opponent, and overall situation) it might not be possible. In which case the use of military force would be appropriate and necessary.
are two items proposed in Sun Tzu in which we feel can be applied with fewer complications than other concepts in Sun Tzu.
Attack the weak areas with your strong - "To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend. To be certain of safety when defending, defend where the enemy cannot attack."
This is why a relatively small group engaging in guerrilla warfare against a superpower is nevertheless effective. No matter how much capital and brand recognition a large corporation may have, it can't be strong at all places. Find its weak areas and enter that market with all your resources. If you have at least comparable products, comparable pricing, and show personal attention, customers will flock to you. It usually takes only one major vendor mistake for a customer to start looking elsewhere.
Build momentum - "One who exploits force commands men into battle like rolling logs and boulders. Logs and boulders are still when on flat ground, but roll when on steep ground. Square shapes are still, but round shapes roll."
Don't gamble on certain individuals for progress but rely on the momentum of the entire group. Your payroll should reflect this strategy. If everyone moves in the right direction, albeit slowly, this is more effective than a few good people pushing. This concept is simply what business consultants mean by teamwork and synergy.
It has been claimed that Sun Tzu's Art of War was read by Napoleon. It is suggested that he in fact read only Machiavelli's Art of War. Your thoughts?
records, Napoleon was an avid reader. As such, we have little doubt he read both especially since they were military works. Both texts were available at the time. J. J. M. Amiot's French translation in 1772 (the first Sun Tzu translation available to the Western world) was an instant success and was reprinted ten years later. Thus, to think Napoleon was ignorant to the book would be, in our opinion, hard to believe. Do you have a comment on the relationship between Sun Tzu and Machiavelli
Te one relationship with Sun Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli was that both lived in an environment full of political and military upheaval. States were battling states for supremacy. Therefore as some would say, "necessity is the mother of all invention," that ideas on the application of warfare were rampant caused by the demand for them. Machiavelli, however, is not as well known for his military ability as his political acumen.
You will hear the "Way" or "Tao" (Wade-Giles) or even "Dao" (Pinyin) used in Chinese literature. In a general sense, the Way is a philosophical meaning for the correct path to doing certain activities; the natural and true method. You may even say the path of the heavens or the gods. The Way presented in Sun Tzu is pretty much the same except it's related to the area of strategy and warfare.
So when Sun Tzu says a general has the Way or applying the Way, he means the general's behavior is "divine" and is based on tried and true principles -- that his people would follow him to the ends of the earth and be willing to die with him. Now that's leadership.
In Larry Vetter's book, "Never Without Heroes: Marine Third Reconnaissance Battalion in Vietnam, 1965-70":
Before I close my conclusions, I would like to mention a few points on a more strategic level of thinking. I recommend that all military planners, whether their positions be political or military, read, discuss, debate, and be trained in the differences between the Western form of war (which has absorbed so much from the teachings of Carl von Clauswitz’s exposition On War) and the teachings found in the ancient Chinese Sun-Tzu’s The Art of Warfare. Ho Chi Minh, Vo Nguyen Giap, and others in the Vietnamese leadership who fought against the French and then the United States understood and used the principles as expressed in that ancient and yet valuable work by Sun-Tzu It is my opinion that their application of Sun-Tzu’s principles of war was superior to that being used by either the French or the United States for the situation in Vietnam.
Also consider John Keegan's book "A History of Warfare":
Though the Chinese ruling dynasties and aristocracies esteemed skill-at-arms and horsemanship, they did not confuse military leadership with administrative skills. And under the Sui and T’ang dynasties the gradualist military strategy first propounded by the fourth-century writer Sun Tzu took root. Sun Tzu drew on an existing corpus of ideas and practices in formalizing his theory; it would not otherwise have recommended itself to the Chinese mind. In its emphasis on avoiding battle except with assurance of victory, of disfavouring risk, of seeking to overawe an enemy by psychological means, and of using time rather than force to wear an invader down (all concepts recognized to be profoundly anti-Clausewitzian by twentieth-century strategists, when the campaigns of Mao Tse-tung and Ho Chi Minh drew Sun Tzu to their attention) his Art of War encouraged the integration of Chinese military with political theory in an intellectual whole.
John Saul's book “Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West” states:
Liddell Hart, perhaps the greatest strategist of this century, found himself restating Sun Tzu’s principles: “For the profoundest truth of war is that the issue of battles is usually decided in the minds of the opposing commanders, not in the bodies of their men.” He continually ridiculed the “official Clausewitz.” To state “that war is a continuation of policy by other means has become a catch-phrase and is therefore dangerous. We can say with equal truth, war is the bankruptcy of policy.”
From Robert Coram's "Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War":
Von Clausewitz is often acknowledged as the greatest of military theoreticians. Rarely has his book been studied as [John] Boyd studied it. As with Sun Tzu, he bought various translations and made copious annotations. For months he compared what von Clausewitz says early in the book with what he says in the middle and at the end. This is laborious work, because von Clausewitz takes a dialectic approach and sometimes seems to argue in favor of polar opposites... Boyd called Spinney late one night and said he had a breakthrough. He began reading passages and explaining two crucial differences between von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. First, von Clausewitz wants to bring the enemy to a big "decisive battle," while Sun Tzu wants to unravel the enemy before a battle. Put another way, von Clausewitz believes wars are decided by set piece battles more than by strategy, deception, and guerrilla-like tactics. This means that even if he wins, there is a bloodbath. Boyd said von Clausewitz's second major flaw is that he spends a lot of time talking about how a commander must minimize "friction" -- that is, the uncertainty or chance that always appears in the "fog of war." He does not deal with maximizing the enemy's friction -- as does Sun Tzu -- but only with minimizing his own
Thomas Huynh, founder of Sonshi.com, guides you through Sun Tzu’s masterwork, highlighting principles that encourage a perceptive and spiritual approach to conflict, enabling you to:
Prevent conflicts before they arise
Peacefully and quickly resolve conflicts when they do arise
Act with courage, intelligence, and benevolence in adversarial situations
Convert potential enemies into friends
Control your emotions before they control you
Learn effective, spiritual, and compassionate ways to handle conflict and intense competition in your life, and experience clarity of purpose and peace of mind, even in the most trying of circumstances. So if you want to expand your knowledge of Sun Tzu's Art of War, The Art of War — Spirituality for Conflict is an essential addition to your library.
The foundation of our website is a new and original Sun Tzu The Art of War version that is specifically rendered to be more accurate and complete than all previous Sun Tzu translations.
It took us more than a year to complete this project where we meticulously translated each individual character from the original Chinese text, in addition to cross references with more than six major English editions.
Therefore, we will continue to have our Sun Tzu translation and other features, e.g., author and scholar interviews, available for free to the public as long as there is strong demand and people find the site valuable. The many positive responses from users around the world keep us going!
To help support us financially, please consider subscribing to the Sonshi Dailycourse. Tell others about us: Tell a Friend.
Free explanations of any concept you don't understand in Sun Tzu's Art of War.
We provide a Sun Tzu bookstore. Sonshi.com only presents the most relevant and reputable translations on the market, saving you time from searching all over the Web.
The Temple. A continually updated section containing a daily, discussion board, strategy works throughout history, and more. It represents strategy as a way of life.
The best method of study is to read the text once to get the idea of the work, but come back and read it again (and again) except now reflect on the words. Ponder and visualize.
Most of all, be confident our translation and website are results of diligent and meticulous work geared toward people like yourself who are motivated to learn Sun Tzu. Go far. We will be by your side whenever you need us along the way.
When you are ready, sign up for the Sonshi Daily.
Specifically, strategy is the science and art of military command as applied to the overall planning and conduct of large-scale combat operations. However in general, it is the skillful management, optimization, and application of limited resources intended to accomplish a specific goal.
In practice, strategy is in essence thinking hard about where you fit and where you are in relations to your environment. It's a sometimes painful exercise that challenges your preconceived ideas and beliefs. You're trying to get to an unbiased and objective viewpoint of the way things are. Then, you take action accordingly.
Of course what we said above is not easy to implement. But it can be realized. Therefore, why is strategy important in a person's life? Strategy helps you make the best decisions based on where you are to get to where you want to be. Training is good, but training after a thorough reflection on where you should put your energies is so much better.
Of all the Sun Tzu books currently on the market, we would recommend the Denma Translation Group's Sun Tzu The Art of War. The translation is incredibly accurate and analysis thorough. It took the authors ten years to complete. For a well established version, you may consider General Samuel Griffith's Art of War.
We have listed the most reputable Sun Tzu versions on the Purchase page.
If you are looking for Sun Tzu applications to business practice, we highly recommend Gerald Michaelson's books. To learn more, go to the Michaelson interview.
though the website's writers are anonymous because there are numerous contributors, the buck stops at the desk of Sonshi.com's founder Thomas Huynh. Sonshi.com is a result of a collective voice. After all, we believe what is written is more important than who writes it. Whether our work stands the test of time is up to our intelligent readers. As enthusiasts of the Art of War book, we simply want to share information about it with others.
What does Sonshi mean?
Sonshi is the English transliteration of Sun Tzu in Japanese. In feudal
at is it that you do, and what do you sell?
We provide an educational website for those interested in learning more about Sun Tzu's Art of War. Our goal is to help people apply the book's concepts and principles correctly. In essence, Sonshi.com teaches you how to win in life.
If you ever said to yourself "The Art of War is an extraordinary book ... I want to learn everything about it!" or "Can these ideas be applied to my life?" or "I have this Art of War book ... now what?", you have come to the right place. Long ago when we first started reading the book, we said the same things! That is why we created Sonshi.com. Sun Tzu's Art of War is our sole passion and labor of love. So welcome.
Almost all features are accessible and free of charge -- without spam, ad banners, or pop-up ads. We do have a Purchase page where we recommend the best Art of War books on the market. We also offer the indispensable Daily Strategy Course subscription; these revenues offset some of our expenses maintaining Sonshi.com.
Frequently quoted but quite possibly the most misunderstood verse from Sun Tzu. As a result, one opinion we encountered even suggested Sun Tzu wasn't about warfare at all! It is neither an ethical nor a philosophical statement. Sun Tzu said,
"One who is skilled in warfare principles subdues the enemy without doing battle, takes the enemy's walled city without attacking, and overthrows the enemy quickly, without protracted warfare. His aim must be to take All-Under-Heaven intact. Therefore, weapons will not be blunted, and gains will be intact. These are the principles of planning attacks."
Therefore, it is mostly a practical, economic decision. Doing battle depletes an enormous amount of capital and supplies, leaving one to be vulnerable to attacks by other parties in the future. It also depletes ones spoils. Victory without doing battle means resources are preserved -- including the lives of men.
A leader should always strive for this objective, but depending on various factors (e.g., his skill in strategy, the opponent, and overall situation) it might not be possible. In which case the use of military force would be appropriate and necessary.
are two items proposed in Sun Tzu in which we feel can be applied with fewer complications than other concepts in Sun Tzu.
Attack the weak areas with your strong - "To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend. To be certain of safety when defending, defend where the enemy cannot attack."
This is why a relatively small group engaging in guerrilla warfare against a superpower is nevertheless effective. No matter how much capital and brand recognition a large corporation may have, it can't be strong at all places. Find its weak areas and enter that market with all your resources. If you have at least comparable products, comparable pricing, and show personal attention, customers will flock to you. It usually takes only one major vendor mistake for a customer to start looking elsewhere.
Build momentum - "One who exploits force commands men into battle like rolling logs and boulders. Logs and boulders are still when on flat ground, but roll when on steep ground. Square shapes are still, but round shapes roll."
Don't gamble on certain individuals for progress but rely on the momentum of the entire group. Your payroll should reflect this strategy. If everyone moves in the right direction, albeit slowly, this is more effective than a few good people pushing. This concept is simply what business consultants mean by teamwork and synergy.
It has been claimed that Sun Tzu's Art of War was read by Napoleon. It is suggested that he in fact read only Machiavelli's Art of War. Your thoughts?
records, Napoleon was an avid reader. As such, we have little doubt he read both especially since they were military works. Both texts were available at the time. J. J. M. Amiot's French translation in 1772 (the first Sun Tzu translation available to the Western world) was an instant success and was reprinted ten years later. Thus, to think Napoleon was ignorant to the book would be, in our opinion, hard to believe. Do you have a comment on the relationship between Sun Tzu and Machiavelli
Te one relationship with Sun Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli was that both lived in an environment full of political and military upheaval. States were battling states for supremacy. Therefore as some would say, "necessity is the mother of all invention," that ideas on the application of warfare were rampant caused by the demand for them. Machiavelli, however, is not as well known for his military ability as his political acumen.
You will hear the "Way" or "Tao" (Wade-Giles) or even "Dao" (Pinyin) used in Chinese literature. In a general sense, the Way is a philosophical meaning for the correct path to doing certain activities; the natural and true method. You may even say the path of the heavens or the gods. The Way presented in Sun Tzu is pretty much the same except it's related to the area of strategy and warfare.
So when Sun Tzu says a general has the Way or applying the Way, he means the general's behavior is "divine" and is based on tried and true principles -- that his people would follow him to the ends of the earth and be willing to die with him. Now that's leadership.
In Larry Vetter's book, "Never Without Heroes: Marine Third Reconnaissance Battalion in Vietnam, 1965-70":
Before I close my conclusions, I would like to mention a few points on a more strategic level of thinking. I recommend that all military planners, whether their positions be political or military, read, discuss, debate, and be trained in the differences between the Western form of war (which has absorbed so much from the teachings of Carl von Clauswitz’s exposition On War) and the teachings found in the ancient Chinese Sun-Tzu’s The Art of Warfare. Ho Chi Minh, Vo Nguyen Giap, and others in the Vietnamese leadership who fought against the French and then the United States understood and used the principles as expressed in that ancient and yet valuable work by Sun-Tzu It is my opinion that their application of Sun-Tzu’s principles of war was superior to that being used by either the French or the United States for the situation in Vietnam.
Also consider John Keegan's book "A History of Warfare":
Though the Chinese ruling dynasties and aristocracies esteemed skill-at-arms and horsemanship, they did not confuse military leadership with administrative skills. And under the Sui and T’ang dynasties the gradualist military strategy first propounded by the fourth-century writer Sun Tzu took root. Sun Tzu drew on an existing corpus of ideas and practices in formalizing his theory; it would not otherwise have recommended itself to the Chinese mind. In its emphasis on avoiding battle except with assurance of victory, of disfavouring risk, of seeking to overawe an enemy by psychological means, and of using time rather than force to wear an invader down (all concepts recognized to be profoundly anti-Clausewitzian by twentieth-century strategists, when the campaigns of Mao Tse-tung and Ho Chi Minh drew Sun Tzu to their attention) his Art of War encouraged the integration of Chinese military with political theory in an intellectual whole.
John Saul's book “Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West” states:
Liddell Hart, perhaps the greatest strategist of this century, found himself restating Sun Tzu’s principles: “For the profoundest truth of war is that the issue of battles is usually decided in the minds of the opposing commanders, not in the bodies of their men.” He continually ridiculed the “official Clausewitz.” To state “that war is a continuation of policy by other means has become a catch-phrase and is therefore dangerous. We can say with equal truth, war is the bankruptcy of policy.”
From Robert Coram's "Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War":
Von Clausewitz is often acknowledged as the greatest of military theoreticians. Rarely has his book been studied as [John] Boyd studied it. As with Sun Tzu, he bought various translations and made copious annotations. For months he compared what von Clausewitz says early in the book with what he says in the middle and at the end. This is laborious work, because von Clausewitz takes a dialectic approach and sometimes seems to argue in favor of polar opposites... Boyd called Spinney late one night and said he had a breakthrough. He began reading passages and explaining two crucial differences between von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. First, von Clausewitz wants to bring the enemy to a big "decisive battle," while Sun Tzu wants to unravel the enemy before a battle. Put another way, von Clausewitz believes wars are decided by set piece battles more than by strategy, deception, and guerrilla-like tactics. This means that even if he wins, there is a bloodbath. Boyd said von Clausewitz's second major flaw is that he spends a lot of time talking about how a commander must minimize "friction" -- that is, the uncertainty or chance that always appears in the "fog of war." He does not deal with maximizing the enemy's friction -- as does Sun Tzu -- but only with minimizing his own
Thomas Huynh, founder of Sonshi.com, guides you through Sun Tzu’s masterwork, highlighting principles that encourage a perceptive and spiritual approach to conflict, enabling you to:
Prevent conflicts before they arise
Peacefully and quickly resolve conflicts when they do arise
Act with courage, intelligence, and benevolence in adversarial situations
Convert potential enemies into friends
Control your emotions before they control you
Learn effective, spiritual, and compassionate ways to handle conflict and intense competition in your life, and experience clarity of purpose and peace of mind, even in the most trying of circumstances. So if you want to expand your knowledge of Sun Tzu's Art of War, The Art of War — Spirituality for Conflict is an essential addition to your library.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Monday, July 12, 2010
The Denial of Death
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Denial of Death is a work of psychology and philosophy written by Ernest Becker and published in 1973. It was awarded the Pulitzer prize for general non-fiction in 1974, two months after the author's death. The book builds largely on the works of Søren Kierkegaard, Sigmund Freud, and one of Freud's colleagues, Otto Rank.
The basic premise of The Denial of Death is that human civilization is ultimately an elaborate, symbolic defense mechanism against the knowledge of our mortality, which in turn acts as the emotional and intellectual response to our basic survival mechanism. Becker argues that a basic duality in human life exists between the physical world of objects and a symbolic world of human meaning. Thus, since man has a dualistic nature consisting of a physical self and a symbolic self, man is able to transcend the dilemma of mortality through heroism, a concept involving his symbolic half. By embarking on what Becker refers to as an "immortality project" (or causa sui), in which he creates or becomes part of something which he feels will last forever, man feels he has "become" heroic and, henceforth, part of something eternal; something that will never die, compared to his physical body that will die one day. This, in turn, gives man the feeling that his life has meaning; a purpose; significance in the grand scheme of things.
From this premise, mental illness is most insightfully extrapolated as a bogging down in one's hero system(s). When someone is experiencing depression, their causa sui (or heroism project) is failing, and they are being consistently reminded of their mortality and insignificance as a result. Schizophrenia is a step further than depression in which one's causa sui is falling apart, making it impossible to engender sufficient defense mechanisms against their mortality; henceforth, the schizophrenic has to create their own reality or "world" in which they are better heroes. Becker argues that the conflict between immortality projects which contradict each other (particularly in religion) is the wellspring for the destruction and misery in our world caused by wars, bigotry, genocide, racism, nationalism, and so forth, since an immortality project which contradicts others indirectly suggests that the others are wrong.
Another theme running throughout the book is that humanity's traditional "hero-systems" i.e. religion, are no longer convincing in the age of reason; science is attempting to solve the problem of man, something that Becker feels it can never do. The book states that we need new convincing "illusions" that enable us to feel heroic in the grand scheme of things, i.e. immortal. Becker, however, does not provide any definitive answer, mainly because he believes that there is no perfect solution. Instead, he hopes that gradual realization of man's innate motivations, namely death, can help to bring about a better world.
Becker's work has had a wider cultural impact beyond the fields of psychology and philosophy. The book made an appearance in Woody Allen's film Annie Hall, when the death-obsessed character Alvy Singer buys it for his girlfriend, Annie Hall. It was referenced by Spalding Gray in his work, It's a Slippery Slope. Bill Clinton quoted it in his autobiography; he also included it as one of twenty one titles in his list of favourite books.
Ernest Becker
| December 31, 2008
http://www.ernestbecker.org/
The human ability to give meaning to colors, flags, stories, and symbols has often led to two or more movements to battle in a bloody conflict for hegemony. Becker wrote, "The last thing man can admit to himself is that his life-ways are arbitrary: this is one of the reasons that people often show derisive glee and scorn over the strange customs of other lands—it is a defense against the awareness that his own way of life may be just as fundamentally contrived as any other. One culture is always a potential menace to another because it is a living example that life can go on heroically without a value framework totally alien to ones own."
The transference of life and meaning to objects and symbols is a human trait that makes conflict more probable. It is no longer a piece of land, cloth, stone or buildingbut my very life and existence. Two heroic systems that are born from this escape from oblivion and this will to significance, cannot stand to co-exist with one another because their mere existence points to the fallacy of their absolute superiority. Thus genocide is even justifiedkill the people to keep the ideology alive. Humans have often sacrificed real life for imaginary life. Becker quotes Jose Ortega Gasset, "Life is at the start a chaos in which one is lost. The individual suspects this, but he is frightened at finding himself face to face with this terrible reality, and tries to cover it up with a curtain of fantasy, where everything is clear. It does not worry him that his ideas are not true, he uses them as trenches for the defense of his existence, as scarecrows to frighten away reality."
Everything is clear in the symbolic realm. In the symbolic arena there are no Tsunamis, earthquakes, oblivion, disease, and death. There is immortality in the symbolic arena and everlasting fame. We humans have given meaning to a world that has not given a second thought to whether an earthquake kills a cat, dog, cockroach or human. Becker noted, "In the world of ritual there arent any accidents, and accidents, as we know, are the things that make life most precarious and meaninglessif life can be so subject to chance, it mustnt have too much meaning."
Despite human narcissism it is clear that whether a chicken gets its head chopped off or a human the world does not miss a beat. This knowledge leads one to the edge of the abyss of nihilism.
Camus reacted to the indifference of the universe with a euphoric pathos that reminds one of what Becker would state as agreed madness, shared madness, disguised and dignified madness, but madness all the same. Brush your teeth, feed your stomach, go to sleep, go Humans have an amazing organ called the brain with a base organ called the stomach. Our religions, arts, and culture are maybe just grand diversions from the reality of death? The legal definition of insanity is defined as a disassociation from reality. Is culture and society an insane reaction to a ridiculous position? To keep sane we become insane? Becker writes, Existence is simply too much of a burden; object-embeddedness and bodily decay are universally the fate of men. Without some kind of ideology of justification people naturally bog down and fail. Or as Freud would put it they demand illusions and constantly give what is unreal precedence over what is real.
Becker makes an important point about the limitations of the enlightenment and modernity. He states, Modern man is the victim of his own disillusionment; he has been disinherited by his own analytic strength.
Professor Michael Polanyi wrote, "The meanings—the coherent entities—which we know as Michelangelos Moses, Beethovens ninth Symphony, the virtue of justice, and the Christian God are not only intangibles.they seem, possibly, to have no existence or being at all in the absence of manthey may appear to be great and worthy of respect. But what if we suppose they are only adventitious results of lower motivations or, eventually, of the reactions of atoms?"
The human ability to give meaning to colors, flags, stories, and symbols has often led to two or more movements to battle in a bloody conflict for hegemony. Becker wrote, "The last thing man can admit to himself is that his life-ways are arbitrary: this is one of the reasons that people often show derisive glee and scorn over the strange customs of other lands—it is a defense against the awareness that his own way of life may be just as fundamentally contrived as any other. One culture is always a potential menace to another because it is a living example that life can go on heroically without a value framework totally alien to ones own."
The transference of life and meaning to objects and symbols is a human trait that makes conflict more probable. It is no longer a piece of land, cloth, stone or buildingbut my very life and existence. Two heroic systems that are born from this escape from oblivion and this will to significance, cannot stand to co-exist with one another because their mere existence points to the fallacy of their absolute superiority. Thus genocide is even justifiedkill the people to keep the ideology alive. Humans have often sacrificed real life for imaginary life. Becker quotes Jose Ortega Gasset, "Life is at the start a chaos in which one is lost. The individual suspects this, but he is frightened at finding himself face to face with this terrible reality, and tries to cover it up with a curtain of fantasy, where everything is clear. It does not worry him that his ideas are not true, he uses them as trenches for the defense of his existence, as scarecrows to frighten away reality."
Everything is clear in the symbolic realm. In the symbolic arena there are no Tsunamis, earthquakes, oblivion, disease, and death. There is immortality in the symbolic arena and everlasting fame. We humans have given meaning to a world that has not given a second thought to whether an earthquake kills a cat, dog, cockroach or human. Becker noted, "In the world of ritual there arent any accidents, and accidents, as we know, are the things that make life most precarious and meaninglessif life can be so subject to chance, it mustnt have too much meaning."
Despite human narcissism it is clear that whether a chicken gets its head chopped off or a human the world does not miss a beat. This knowledge leads one to the edge of the abyss of nihilism.
Camus reacted to the indifference of the universe with a euphoric pathos that reminds one of what Becker would state as agreed madness, shared madness, disguised and dignified madness, but madness all the same. Brush your teeth, feed your stomach, go to sleep, go Humans have an amazing organ called the brain with a base organ called the stomach. Our religions, arts, and culture are maybe just grand diversions from the reality of death? The legal definition of insanity is defined as a disassociation from reality. Is culture and society an insane reaction to a ridiculous position? To keep sane we become insane? Becker writes, Existence is simply too much of a burden; object-embeddedness and bodily decay are universally the fate of men. Without some kind of ideology of justification people naturally bog down and fail. Or as Freud would put it they demand illusions and constantly give what is unreal precedence over what is real.
Becker makes an important point about the limitations of the enlightenment and modernity. He states, Modern man is the victim of his own disillusionment; he has been disinherited by his own analytic strength.
Professor Michael Polanyi wrote, "The meanings—the coherent entities—which we know as Michelangelos Moses, Beethovens ninth Symphony, the virtue of justice, and the Christian God are not only intangibles.they seem, possibly, to have no existence or being at all in the absence of manthey may appear to be great and worthy of respect. But what if we suppose they are only adventitious results of lower motivations or, eventually, of the reactions of atoms?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)